Moderation & appeals

How we find problems, how fast we act, and how you can challenge a decision.

How content is reviewed

Creators are verified before they can publish. After that we combine automated checks, member reports and human review. People — not software alone — make the final decision on removals and account actions, and we keep a record of every report and decision.

Reporting content

Use the report control on any post, or the standalone report form. Reports are sorted by category: non-consensual or underage content and other illegal content go to priority review with a 24-hour target; everything else enters the standard queue with a 15-day target. You do not need an account to report.

Takedown requests

If you are a rights holder, or are shown in content without your consent, file a takedown request. We require an ownership or identity declaration and remove content pending review where the claim is credible. We also act on valid court and government orders within the time the order sets (and in any case promptly).

What happens to a violating account

• Content is removed or restricted on confirmation of a violation, and access to it is revoked immediately.
• The account may be suspended during investigation, and terminated if the violation is confirmed.
• Where legally required, we report the matter to the relevant authority and preserve evidence.

Appeals

If we removed your content, restricted your account, or rejected your report, you can appeal on the Grievance officer page, quoting your case reference. A different reviewer looks at it, and we reply with the reasons. Zero-tolerance removals can be appealed but stay removed while the appeal is reviewed.